Robot vacuums have revolutionized home cleaning, offering convenience and automation. The Shark Ion Robot 750 and the Roomba 960 are two popular models that cater to different segments of the market. The Shark Ion Robot 750 is an entry-level robot vacuum that provides basic cleaning functionality at an affordable price. It’s designed for users who want to automate light cleaning tasks without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the Roomba 960 is a mid-range robot vacuum known for its advanced features and superior cleaning performance compared to budget models. It appeals to consumers who are willing to invest more for better navigation, stronger suction, and smart home integration.
Choosing between these two models depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for an affordable way to maintain relatively clean floors with minimal effort, the Shark Ion Robot 750 might suffice. However, if you have a larger home, pets, or require more thorough cleaning, the Roomba 960’s advanced features and performance may justify the higher cost. This comparison will delve into the specifics of each model to help you make an informed decision.
Table of Contents
- Quick Verdict
- Short Review of Shark Ion Robot 750
- Short Review of Roomba 960
- Key Differences at a Glance
- Specifications Comparison
- Price Comparison
- Design and Build Quality
- Performance Face-Off
- Special Features Comparison
- Usability and User Experience
- Maintenance and Longevity
- Who Should Buy Shark Ion Robot 750?
- Who Should Buy Roomba 960?
- Final Recommendation
Quick Verdict
- For budget-conscious users: The Shark Ion Robot 750 offers a basic cleaning solution at a lower price point.
- For superior cleaning performance: The Roomba 960 excels in debris pickup and navigation, making it ideal for homes with carpets and pets.
- For smart home integration: Both models offer app control and voice assistant compatibility, but the Roomba 960 has more advanced mapping and customization features.
Short Review of Shark Ion Robot 750
The Shark Ion Robot 750 is designed as an entry-level option for those seeking automated cleaning without a hefty price tag. It features a tri-brush system, including side brushes, channel brushes, and a multi-surface brush roll, to handle various debris types on different floor surfaces. The robot is equipped with Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing users to control it via the SharkClean app, Amazon Alexa, or Google Assistant. Its key strengths lie in its ease of use, voice control capabilities, and ability to navigate around obstacles, making it a convenient addition to a smart home.
Despite its affordability, the Shark Ion Robot 750 offers decent cleaning performance on hard floors and is capable of picking up most larger debris. It has a long battery life, and it comes with physical boundary strips to keep it away from areas you don’t want it to clean. However, its random pathing navigation system can be inefficient, and it struggles with fine debris and pet hair on carpets. While it may not match the performance of higher-end models, the Shark Ion Robot 750 provides a solid start for those new to robot vacuums.
Short Review of Roomba 960
The iRobot Roomba 960 is a mid-range robot vacuum designed to offer a balance of advanced features and performance without the premium price tag of the top-tier models. It boasts smart navigation with a camera that allows for sensor mapping, ensuring efficient cleaning patterns and comprehensive coverage of your home. The Roomba 960’s AeroForce cleaning system combines dual multi-surface brushes and stronger suction to effectively remove dirt, debris, and pet hair from both hard floors and carpets. It also features Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing for control via the iRobot Home app, and is compatible with voice assistants like Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant.
The Roomba 960 excels in cleaning performance, particularly on bare floors and low-pile carpets. It has the ability to recharge and resume cleaning. Its smart pathing feature enhances maneuverability. While it may struggle with fine sugar debris on carpets, it generally provides thorough cleaning across various surfaces. Although it requires regular maintenance and parts replacement, the Roomba 960 stands out as a reliable and efficient robot vacuum for maintaining a clean home.
Key Differences at a Glance

| Feature | Shark Ion Robot 750 | Roomba 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation | Random pathing | Smart pathing with camera-based mapping |
| Cleaning System | Tri-Brush System (side, channel, multi-surface brushes) | AeroForce Cleaning System (dual multi-surface brushes, 5x suction) |
| Carpet Cleaning | Struggles with fine debris and pet hair | Excellent on low-pile carpets, good on high-pile carpets |
| Battery Life | Long battery life | Shorter run time, but with Recharge & Resume |
| Price | Lower | Higher |
| Smart Features | App control, voice control, boundary strips | App control, voice control, cleaning reports, dirt detection |
Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Shark Ion Robot 750 | Roomba 960 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Number | RV750 | 960 |
| Battery Type | Lithium-ion | Lithium-ion |
| Run Time | 60 minutes | 75 minutes |
| Charge Time | Varies | ~3 hours |
| Dustbin Capacity | Not specified | 0.6L |
| Filter Type | Standard | AeroForce High-Efficiency Filter |
| Navigation | Random | iAdapt 2.0 with Visual Localization |
| Floor Types | Hard floors, low-pile carpets | Hard floors, carpets |
| App Control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice Control | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Boundary Marking | Boundary strips | Virtual Wall Barriers |
| Dimensions (Diameter x Height) | 12.6″ x 2.6″ | 13.8″ x 3.6″ |
| Weight | 5.5 lbs | 8.5 lbs |
Price Comparison
The Shark Ion Robot 750 typically retails for around $200-$300, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. Its value proposition lies in providing a basic level of automated cleaning at an accessible price point. While it lacks some of the advanced features of higher-end models, it offers a cost-effective solution for maintaining relatively clean floors.
The Roomba 960, on the other hand, is priced in the range of $400-$600. Its higher price reflects its advanced navigation system, stronger suction, and smart features like cleaning reports and dirt detection. The Roomba 960 offers a better cost-to-feature ratio for users who prioritize performance and are willing to invest more in a more capable robot vacuum.
Design and Build Quality
The Shark Ion Robot 750 features a sleek, low-profile design, allowing it to easily navigate under furniture. It has a black and grey finish with gold trimming, giving it a modern look. The build quality is decent, with a lightweight construction that makes it easy to move around. However, it may not be as durable as higher-end models.
The Roomba 960 has a more robust and sturdy design. While it is slightly taller than the Shark Ion Robot 750, it still fits under most furniture. Its construction feels more premium, with durable materials that can withstand daily use. The Roomba 960 also features a self-adjusting cleaning head that adapts to different floor types, ensuring optimal cleaning performance.
Performance Face-Off
Cleaning Performance on Hard Floors
The Shark Ion Robot 750 performs well on hard floors, effectively picking up small and large debris. However, it may struggle with fine dust and particles, leaving some residue behind. Its random navigation pattern can also result in missed spots, requiring multiple passes to achieve thorough cleaning.
The Roomba 960 excels on hard floors, leaving them spotless after a single pass. Its AeroForce cleaning system and stronger suction power ensure that even the finest particles are effectively removed. The Roomba 960’s smart navigation system also helps it cover the entire floor area efficiently, minimizing missed spots.
Cleaning Performance on Carpets
The Shark Ion Robot 750 struggles with carpets, particularly those with medium to high pile. It has difficulty picking up embedded dirt, pet hair, and fine debris, often leaving carpets looking unclean. Its brush roll may also get tangled with long hair and fibers, requiring frequent maintenance.
The Roomba 960 performs significantly better on carpets, thanks to its powerful suction and dual multi-surface brushes. It effectively removes dirt, pet hair, and debris from both low and high-pile carpets. While it may struggle slightly with fine sugar debris, it generally provides thorough cleaning and leaves carpets looking refreshed.
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance
The Shark Ion Robot 750 uses a random navigation pattern, which can be inefficient and result in missed spots. While it has sensors to detect obstacles and avoid ledges, it may sometimes get stuck in tight spaces or struggle to navigate around furniture.
The Roomba 960 features iAdapt 2.0 navigation with visual localization, allowing it to intelligently map your home and clean in an efficient, systematic pattern. It can also remember its location and resume cleaning after recharging. The Roomba 960 is better at avoiding obstacles and navigating complex layouts, ensuring comprehensive cleaning coverage.
Special Features Comparison
- Shark Ion Robot 750: Comes with boundary strips to create no-go zones.
- Roomba 960: Features Recharge & Resume, allowing it to return to its charging station and resume cleaning where it left off. It also generates cleaning reports, providing insights into cleaning performance and coverage.
Usability and User Experience
The Shark Ion Robot 750 is easy to use, with a simple interface and straightforward controls. The SharkClean app allows for basic scheduling and control, but it lacks advanced features like mapping and customization. It is suitable for users who want a no-frills robot vacuum that is easy to set up and operate.
The Roomba 960 offers a more advanced user experience, with a feature-rich app that provides detailed cleaning reports, mapping capabilities, and customizable cleaning preferences. Its smart navigation system ensures efficient cleaning, and its dirt detection feature allows it to focus on areas that need extra attention. The Roomba 960 is better suited for users who want more control and customization options.
Maintenance and Longevity
![]()
The Shark Ion Robot 750 requires regular cleaning of the brush roll and emptying of the dustbin. The filter also needs to be replaced periodically. While it feels decently well-built, many parts need regular cleaning or replacing.
The Roomba 960 requires similar maintenance, with regular cleaning of the brush rolls and emptying of the dustbin. The AeroForce High-Efficiency Filter needs to be replaced regularly to maintain optimal performance. The Roomba 960 has a reputation for durability and longevity, with many users reporting years of reliable service.
Who Should Buy Shark Ion Robot 750?
The Shark Ion Robot 750 is a good choice for:
- Budget-conscious consumers looking for an affordable robot vacuum.
- Users with small homes or apartments with mostly hard floors.
- Individuals who want a simple, easy-to-use robot vacuum with basic features.
- Those who need a robot vacuum to clean obvious messes.
Who Should Buy Roomba 960?
The Roomba 960 is a good choice for:
- Users who prioritize cleaning performance and efficiency.
- Homes with a mix of hard floors and carpets.
- Pet owners who need a robot vacuum that can effectively remove pet hair.
- Individuals who want advanced features like smart navigation, cleaning reports, and customizable cleaning preferences.
Final Recommendation
In the battle between the Shark Ion Robot 750 and the Roomba 960, the Roomba 960 emerges as the better overall value. While it comes with a higher price tag, its superior cleaning performance, advanced navigation system, and smart features justify the investment. The Roomba 960 is particularly well-suited for homes with carpets and pets, where its powerful suction and dual multi-surface brushes can effectively remove dirt, debris, and pet hair.
However, if you are on a tight budget and only need a basic robot vacuum for light cleaning tasks on hard floors, the Shark Ion Robot 750 may suffice. Just be aware that it lacks some of the advanced features and performance capabilities of the Roomba 960.







